What’s especially notable is that in recent years, Congress has expanded planning opportunities by indexing annual giving limits for inflation ($111,000 per person in 2026) and allowing certain one-time QCDs (“Legacy IRAs”) to fund charitable gift annuities and charitable remainder trusts. And now, proposed legislation known as the “Charity Parity Act” would, if enacted, extend QCD treatment beyond IRAs to include employer-sponsored retirement plans such as 401(k)s, 403(b)s, and 457(b)s. This potential change in the law would remove the extra step of rolling assets into an IRA before making a charitable gift, simplifying the process for many donors whose retirement savings remain primarily in workplace plans.

Consider a typical client scenario. Your client, age 74, is taking Required Minimum Distributions (“RMDs”) from a traditional IRA. Because the client claims the standard deduction, charitable gifts do not generate additional tax savings. By instead directing a portion of the RMD to a qualified charity as a QCD, the client can satisfy part or all of the RMD obligation without increasing taxable income. In many cases, this can also help reduce Medicare premium surcharges and lessen the taxation of Social Security benefits, creating planning advantages beyond the charitable deduction itself.

Here are three examples of how the Lenawee Community Foundation can help your client achieve charitable goals through QCDs:

1. A client directs a QCD from an IRA to Lenawee’s Health, Happiness, and Hope Fund at the Lenawee Community Foundation to support broad community needs. The client satisfies part or all of the client’s annual RMD requirements while supporting flexible grantmaking that addresses changing priorities in the region.
2. A client uses a QCD to contribute to a field-of-interest fund at the Lenawee Community Foundation focused on causes such as education, healthcare, the arts, or environmental conservation. This allows the client to support a specific area of passion while relying on the Lenawee Community Foundation’s expertise to identify effective nonprofit organizations over time.
3. A client makes a QCD to an existing designated fund or scholarship fund held at the Lenawee Community Foundation. For example, the client may support a favorite local nonprofit through a designated fund or help students pursue higher education through an endowed scholarship fund, all while reducing taxable income through a QCD.

Keep in mind that charitable giving with IRAs goes beyond current gifts to charity! As part of advising clients about their IRAs, be sure to check their beneficiary designations. Not only is it tax advantageous for a client to name a fund at the Lenawee Community Foundation or other public charity as beneficiary of an IRA, but it’s also a best practice to avoid problems in the future. (Retirement plan beneficiary designations continue to show up in cautionary tales!)

For attorneys, CPAs, and financial advisors, developments related to QCDs are worth watching closely. QCDs increasingly serve as a natural connector among retirement planning, philanthropy, and legacy conversations. Just as importantly, QCD discussions often open the door to broader planning opportunities, helping clients align financial goals with the causes and communities they care about most. As always, please reach out to the Lenawee Community Foundation anytime! 

The post Good news keeps coming: Retirement plans and charitable giving appeared first on Lenawee Community Foundation.

Here are three things to know:

—Mainstream media is picking up the pace in its coverage of charitable planning techniques. For example, the Wall Street Journal recently published an article about donor-advised funds as a tool for tax savings and community impact. Many clients may not realize that the Lenawee Community Foundation offers donor-advised funds, along with other options for structuring a charitable giving plan to support their favorite causes and address critical community issues. Be sure to reach out to the Lenawee Community Foundation whenever a client asks you about setting up a donor-advised fund. 

—Thoughtful planning is especially important in light of the new floor on itemized charitable deductions. Starting in 2026, to be eligible for a deduction, a client’s qualified deductions must exceed 0.5% of adjusted gross income, essentially raising the threshold at which charitable giving produces a tax benefit. This could make it advantageous for some of your clients to “bunch” charitable contributions through a donor-advised fund, allowing the client to front-load donations into a single tax year to cross the threshold. 

—At the same time, under a “cap” provision in the new law, if a client is in the 37% federal income tax bracket, itemized charitable deductions are now capped at the 35% tax rate. In simplified terms, depending on other factors, this means that if a client donates $10,000, the tax break would be $3,500 instead of $3,700. In short, the floor and the cap add extra complexity to helping clients plan their charitable contributions. 

—The new tax laws have changed the landscape for not only your clients who itemize deductions but also for those who do not itemize. Non-itemizers are now eligible for an “above the line” deduction of $1,000 for single filers and $2,000 for joint filers. Be aware, however, that the new deduction for non-itemizers does not apply to noncash gifts or gifts to donor-advised funds. Because both noncash gifts and gifts to donor-advised funds are important tax planning tools for many clients, this limitation is worth noting in your discussions. 

—Finally, remember that donating appreciated stock held for more than one year is usually more tax-efficient than writing a check. That’s because it allows your client to avoid capital gains tax on the appreciation. What’s more, clients who itemize deductions will be eligible to claim a tax deduction for the full fair market value. 

Please reach out to the Lenawee Community Foundation anytime. We know the new tax laws add a lot to your plate, and we are always happy to point you in the right direction as you conduct research and offer counsel to your clients. And remember, you don’t have to jump headfirst into the complexity during your client discussions. Even talking about philanthropy in the simplest terms can help strengthen your client relationships and grow your practice.

The post Wake-up Call: OBBBA Changes and Client Conversations appeared first on Lenawee Community Foundation.

But for some clients—especially business owners, collectors, and affluent retirees—valuable assets may take a different form entirely. Boats, airplanes, cars, RVs, and other tangible property can represent a mixed bag of characteristics: significant wealth, ongoing maintenance costs, and emotional attachment, all of which may add up to a charitable giving opportunity. These situations may no longer be one-off cases. Classic cars are a notable example, with some estimates tallying the total at more than 43 million vehicles in the United States alone—an estimated $1 trillion in total insurable value!

Here are four tips to consider as you work with your charitable clients.

Always reach out to the Lenawee Community Foundation

Anytime you’re dealing with a charitable client, please reach out to the Lenawee Community Foundation to explore your client’s options. Your clients may be surprised to learn that public charities, such as the Lenawee Community Foundation, can accept a wide range of noncash assets, provided the assets can be evaluated, valued, transferred, and ultimately liquidated to support your clients’ charitable goals.

Ask questions beyond balance sheet basics

Clients may forget to mention that they own highly appreciated noncash assets. As clients prepare to meet with you, they are often so focused on gathering investment statements and real estate information that they forget about classic cars, RVs, planes, and boats! Comprehensive conversations are especially timely as many affluent households continue to hold substantial wealth outside of traditional investment portfolios. Recreational assets purchased years ago may now hold significant value while also generating ongoing expenses, storage concerns, and succession-planning questions. Clients who are downsizing or simplifying during retirement may welcome charitable strategies that transform underused assets into community impact. 

Build your client’s charitable plan prior to a sale

When you spot unusual assets on a client’s balance sheet, and you know your client is charitable, it’s important to consider the possibilities. A client preparing to sell a classic car or boat, for example, could incur significant capital gains tax if the asset has appreciated in value. Contributing the asset to a fund at the Lenawee Community Foundation before a sale may help reduce or eliminate those taxes while also generating funds to support charitable causes the client cares about.

Pay attention to the rules

Gifts of noncash assets require careful coordination. Unlike publicly traded securities, these assets involve additional due diligence. Title transfers, appraisals, environmental reviews for real estate, insurance considerations, debt obligations, marketability, and liquidation logistics all require attention. The IRS also imposes specific substantiation and reporting requirements for charitable deductions involving noncash gifts.

The team at the Lenawee Community Foundation is happy to work alongside you and clients’ other attorneys, CPAs, valuation experts, and financial advisors to determine whether proposed gifts are feasible and which structures might be best. In many cases, the Lenawee Community Foundation can accept the asset and facilitate its sale.

The bottom line here is that for a charitable client, using a much-loved car collection, boat, or other luxury asset to support favorite causes and address community needs may be far more appealing than knowing the asset could sit in storage for years and years, with no end in sight to the maintenance expenses. You can add tremendous value by helping your clients consider whether highly specialized collections and “passion assets” are better suited for charitable planning than for transfer through an estate, especially when heirs may not share the same interest in maintaining or managing them. Whether your client owns a rare bicycle collection, antique toy collection, classic cars, or a country music producer’s private library, conversations about donating unusual assets can help clients simplify their estates, support charitable priorities, and avoid placing the emotional and logistical burden of niche collections on the next generation.

Please reach out anytime!

The post Getting creative: Unusual noncash assets can make great gifts to charity appeared first on Lenawee Community Foundation.

But what happens to charitable assets in the event of divorce? Over the last few years, in the wake of high-profile divorces, more and more advisors have been pondering this question. It’s certainly worth considering so you can be prepared if–and likely when–you encounter such a situation. It’s especially important as women play an increasingly important role in a couple’s philanthropy. 

For many couples, philanthropy is deeply personal and closely tied to shared values developed over time. What’s more, advisors who engage both partners on all planning matters, including charitable giving, are more likely, according to research described in a recent white paper, to grow their practices and earn client referrals. 

But from a legal standpoint, charitable giving during marriage is not purely personal—it is often subject to the same rules that govern other marital assets. In community property states, for example, assets acquired during marriage are generally considered jointly owned, and spouses owe fiduciary duties to one another regarding the use of those assets. That framework can create complications when one spouse makes a significant charitable gift without the other’s knowledge or consent. Indeed, unilateral gifts of community property may be challenged, and in some cases, the full value of the gift may be attributed back to the donating spouse in a divorce proceeding. This may be a surprising outcome for clients who assume that charitable intent alone resolves any questions about ownership or control.

The implications extend beyond outright gifts. Philanthropic vehicles such as donor-advised funds, private foundations, and charitable trusts can also become points of negotiation in divorce. These structures may no longer be considered part of the marital estate once funded, but questions about control, governance, and ongoing advisory privileges can still create tension between spouses.

For attorneys, CPAs, and financial advisors, the takeaway is clear: charitable planning does not exist in a vacuum. Conversations about significant gifts—especially those made during marriage—should include coordination with legal counsel and, where appropriate, documentation of mutual intent. Encouraging clients to align on charitable decisions in advance can help avoid disputes later and preserve both financial and philanthropic goals.

As always, remember that the Lenawee Community Foundation is here for you! Whether a client is considering a current gift, establishing a charitable vehicle, or navigating a complex life transition such as divorce, the Lenawee Community Foundation can serve as a resource to help implement the recommendations of legal and tax counsel in a way that is both effective and durable. Anytime you are talking with a client about charitable giving, give us a call! Including the Lenawee Community Foundation early in the conversation can help ensure that your clients’ charitable intentions are carried out smoothly, even when circumstances change. 

We look forward to working together! 

The post Calling it Splits: What Happens to Charitable Assets in a Divorce? appeared first on Lenawee Community Foundation.

Consider this scenario.

When David and Laura arrive at your office for their annual planning meeting, the tone feels different from prior years. In their early 70s and recently retired, David and Laura have always approached financial decisions with a long-term mindset. But today, Laura opens the conversation with a note of concern.

“We’re not panicking,” she says, “but it’s hard to ignore what’s going on in the markets. It just feels unsettled.”

You nod. You’ve been hearing similar sentiments from many clients. Even when portfolios remain relatively strong, uncertainty alone can create stress. Studies have consistently shown that financial concerns weigh heavily on emotional well-being across generations, and market volatility tends to amplify those feelings.

As you walk through David and Laura’s portfolio and estate plan, the numbers tell a reassuring story. Their overall financial plan is still on track, and their estate plan still reflects their goals. But you recognize that this moment calls for more than reassurance. It is an opportunity to reframe how charitable giving fits into the broader picture.

“You’ve both been incredibly consistent in your support of local organizations,” you say. “Tell me how you’re feeling about giving this year.”

David pauses. “We still want to give,” he says. “We just don’t want to make a mistake if the market gets worse.”

That hesitation is familiar. Rather than pulling back entirely, many clients simply need a way to move forward with confidence.

You start with a simple reminder.

“Not all stocks are down.”

You point to a portion of their portfolio that has performed well over time. These appreciated positions present an opportunity. By contributing long-term appreciated stock to their donor-advised fund at the Lenawee Community Foundation, David and Laura may be able to avoid capital gains tax while supporting the causes they care about. Even in a volatile market, this strategy remains one of the most efficient ways to give.

Laura leans in. “So even now, that still makes sense?”

“It often does,” you reply. “And it can give you flexibility. You can make the gift now, receive the tax benefits, and then take your time recommending grants.”

The conversation begins to shift. Instead of focusing solely on uncertainty, David and Laura are now thinking about options.

You also gently raise another point.

“Market cycles come and go, but community needs don’t pause.”

You explain that periods of economic strain often increase demand for nonprofit services, particularly for households already feeling the effects of inflation and rising costs. The Lenawee Community Foundation is closely connected to these needs and can help ensure that their giving is as impactful as possible.

Finally, you mention a strategy they have not yet used.

“Because you’re both over 70 ½, we should also look at Qualified Charitable Distributions from your IRAs.”

You walk them through how a QCD could satisfy required minimum distributions while avoiding income tax on those amounts. For clients in their stage of life, it is a straightforward and effective way to continue supporting charitable priorities regardless of market conditions. “You can direct your QCDs to certain types of funds at the Lenawee Community Foundation,” you explain. “You can’t use them to add to your donor-advised fund (at least not yet), but you can support the Foundation’s strategic priorities to help the whole region thrive.”

By the end of the meeting, David and Laura feel a renewed sense of clarity. They decide to move forward with a gift of appreciated stock to a donor-advised fund and explore a QCD over the summer to avoid the year-end rush. Just as importantly, they feel reassured that their charitable giving does not need to stop simply because the market feels uncertain.

Situations like this are increasingly common. Even the possibility of a downturn can shape client behavior, but it can also open the door to meaningful planning conversations and help keep charitable giving going strong across our community. As always, the Lenawee Community Foundation is here to help you navigate these discussions—offering practical strategies, local insight, and support for your clients’ charitable goals in every type of market environment.

The post Case study: Charitable giving in a down market appeared first on Lenawee Community Foundation.

Recent research underscores just how pronounced this divide is becoming. Individuals with a net worth of $30 million or more—often referred to as ultra-high-net-worth donors—are playing an increasingly outsized role in philanthropy, accounting for a significant and growing share of total charitable giving. At the same time, policy changes are encouraging broader participation at the other end of the spectrum, bringing new donors into the fold even if their initial gifts are modest. The result is a philanthropic landscape that is simultaneously becoming more concentrated and more expansive.

For your ultra-high-net-worth clients, charitable giving is rarely about a single transaction. Instead, it is often deeply integrated into long-term planning around wealth transfer, business succession, and family legacy. These clients may be evaluating complex assets, timing considerations, and multigenerational involvement. Conversations tend to focus on strategy—how philanthropy aligns with identity, values, and long-term impact. The Lenawee Community Foundation can help you navigate these discussions by offering flexible structures, local insight, and support for engaging the next generation in meaningful ways.

By contrast, clients earlier in their wealth-building years—including the children and grandchildren of ultra-high-net-worth clients—may be engaging with charitable giving in a more incremental and exploratory way. The availability of a charitable deduction for non-itemizers creates a new opportunity to introduce philanthropy as part of their financial lives sooner than in the past. For these clients, the focus is often on establishing habits, identifying causes, and understanding how giving fits alongside other priorities. Even relatively small gifts can serve as the foundation for lifelong philanthropic engagement. (Note that the new deduction for non-itemizers applies only to cash gifts and is not available for gifts to donor-advised funds.)

These two groups are not just separated by wealth—they are operating under different incentives, different planning horizons, and different motivations. As a trusted advisor, recognizing these distinctions can help you tailor your conversations and add value in more meaningful ways. Some clients may benefit from sophisticated planning strategies, while others simply need a clear and accessible entry point.

Here is one final but important point: Regardless of whether a client itemizes or doesn’t itemize, pay close attention to clients who are age 70 ½ and over and who own IRAs. Qualified Charitable Distributions are a powerful and tax-advantaged tool for clients to transfer up to $111,000 per taxpayer (2026 limit) to support favorite causes. What’s more, proposed legislation may open the door for your clients to use QCDs to fund their donor-advised funds at the Lenawee Community Foundation. Right now, clients can use QCDs to fund field-of-interest, unrestricted funds, and certain other types of funds at the Foundation, but not donor-advised funds.   

As always, the Lenawee Community Foundation is here to support both ends of this spectrum. Whether your client is structuring a complex gift involving closely held assets or taking the first steps toward organized charitable giving, our team can help you identify the right approach. We are honored to be your partner in serving your charitable clients across every stage of their philanthropy journey.

The post Serving charitable clients: Dual strategies emerge appeared first on Lenawee Community Foundation.

In two recent rulings, the underlying message is consistent: Courts and the IRS continue to apply the technical requirements governing charitable deductions with precision. Your clients’ good intentions are not enough.

Strict substantiation: A familiar but critical reminder

Gibson v. Commissioner serves as yet another reminder that it is really important for your clients to substantiate their charitable deductions. Time and again, both the IRS and the Tax Court have disallowed a taxpayer’s deduction because rules were not followed. In Gibson, a married couple claimed nearly $194,000 in noncash charitable contributions related to donated personal property. The court did not dispute that tangible items were transferred to a charitable organization. Instead, the deduction failed because the taxpayers did not satisfy the detailed substantiation requirements—specifically, contemporaneous written acknowledgments and qualified appraisal standards.

No matter how strong a client’s desire to make a difference through charitable donations, technical compliance drives deductibility. Form 8283 thresholds, appraisal rules, and acknowledgment language are not administrative formalities; they are statutory requirements. The Gibson case provides a practical example to share with clients who may be inclined to “drop off” significant in-kind gifts without first consulting their advisory team.

Here’s the key takeaway: Even though you as an attorney, CPA, or financial advisor may fully understand the importance of following the rules, you still need to remind your clients regularly. You don’t want a client to ask “Why didn’t you tell us?” when they learn the hard way that they should have kept better records.

Exempt status is not forever

The lesson in Milk Saving Starving Children Foundation v. Commissioner is that if you say you’ve got milk, you’d better have milk! In Milk, the Tax Court upheld the IRS’s revocation of 501(c)(3) status for an organization that failed to operate exclusively for charitable purposes and conferred impermissible private benefits. The organization’s stated mission—to distribute milk—was in fact charitable. Over time, though, its operations drifted away from distributing milk to operating a coffee shop and hosting a golf tournament.

Here’s why we’re sharing this case:

-The Tax Court’s written opinion in Milk provides a terrific overview of the legal principles behind one of the cornerstones of tax-exempt status: a charity’s ongoing activities must further its exempt purposes. As you bring new attorneys, CPAs, and financial advisors into your practice, the Milk case is simply terrific for training purposes.

-As it applies to your client work, remember the Milk case when a client expresses interest in supporting a lesser-known or newly formed organization. Please reach out to the Lenawee Community Foundation in these instances because our team can provide insight on any charitable organization, whether well-established or new—and offer safeguards through field-of-interest funds and other vehicles.

Thank you for the opportunity to work together to serve your charitable clients! Our goal, as always, is to serve as a practical resource—helping you ensure that your clients’ charitable intentions are fulfilled with clarity, compliance, and confidence.

The post Documentation is no joke and coffee is not milk: Two important tax rulings appeared first on Lenawee Community Foundation.

March is an especially good time to reflect on the evolving role of women in philanthropy because it’s Women’s History Month. Increasingly, women are leading charitable decisions in their families, especially as more women are serving as primary financial decision-makers, according to Indiana University’s Lilly Family School of Philanthropy’s Women Give 2024: 20 Years of Gender & Giving Trends.

Two scenarios are driving this change:

–In many families, a leadership shift happens gradually. For example, a daughter becomes more engaged over the years in conversations about the family’s charitable giving. Or a spouse who once deferred philanthropic decisions begins to shape priorities more directly.

–In other cases, the transition is sudden and deeply personal—often following the death of a spouse or parent—when a woman assumes sole responsibility for stewarding both financial assets and charitable intent.

Here are four examples of how your awareness of these trends can play out in your day-to-day practice:

Help your clients give through thick and thin.

According to the Women Give 2024 study, over the past two decades, single women experienced a smaller decline in charitable participation than single men, and their average giving amounts held steadier or increased in certain contexts (e.g., secular causes during COVID-19). Be aware of this trend as you represent single women; it may be a priority for them to continue giving even when times are tough. The Lenawee Community Foundation can help you develop a charitable giving plan to enable women-led philanthropy to continue through life’s ups and downs.

Discuss national trends and local needs.

According to the Women’s Philanthropy Institute at Indiana University’s Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, for the first time, between 2022 and 2023, giving to women’s and girls’ organizations surpassed 2% of overall charitable giving. This represents over $11 billion going to women’s and girls’ organizations each year. Note, however, that when adjusted for inflation, the amount actually declined between 2021 and 2023. This trend is worth mentioning to clients, especially with the help of the Lenawee Community Foundation team to share parallel local trends and opportunities to make an impact.

Ask about all forms of philanthropy.

According to the 2025 Bank of America Study of Philanthropy: Charitable Giving by Affluent Households, 43% of affluent households volunteered in 2024, up from 37% in 2022—volunteers tend to give more and support causes more deeply, a pattern often stronger among women. Be sure to ask your female clients about causes they support both financially and through volunteerism.

Tailor advice for single women.

Research shows that participation trends vary by household type, with single women maintaining more consistent giving patterns over long periods. Pay particular attention to building thoughtful charitable giving plans for single women households. The Lenawee Community Foundation can help maximize both impact and financial planning goals as you serve these clients.

As is the case when you are working with any charitable client, our team is honored to be your partner. Whether your client is establishing a new structure, building a comprehensive strategy around an existing donor-advised or other type of fund, or navigating inherited philanthropic responsibilities, we are here to help ensure their giving reflects both enduring legacy and evolving purpose.

The post Women and philanthropy: Four insights to inform your practice appeared first on Lenawee Community Foundation.

Research and survey results tell us that many clients’ most consequential estate and financial planning activities arise not from long-term intentions, but from sudden change. Moments like this are challenging because clients are often overwhelmed and unsure how to proceed, and even the best advice can feel like too much information delivered too soon. In these situations, be aware that charitable planning can help re-anchor clients’ decision-making in values rather than fear or urgency. For many clients, generosity is one of the few topics that still feels familiar when everything else is shifting.

Here are three examples:

Change in assets

Following a divorce settlement, a client may suddenly be holding cash, concentrated stock, or other highly appreciated assets. The client may also be juggling other priorities: adjusting lifestyle expectations, supporting adult children, and rethinking an estate plan. When the client also wants to do something charitable but isn’t sure yet what organizations to support, setting up a donor-advised fund at the Lenawee Community Foundation can be a natural fit in some cases, allowing the client to be eligible for a tax deduction when the contribution is made while taking time to decide which charities to support and when.

Loss of spouse

A client whose spouse has recently passed away may want to make a charitable gift in the spouse’s memory, but likes the idea that the gift could benefit the community for many generations and address urgent needs that arise decades from now. Setting up an unrestricted fund at the Lenawee Community Foundation allows a client to support evolving community needs over time as well as support the mission of the Lenawee Community Foundation itself.

Retirement

A 74-year-old client who just retired is feeling less “relevant” outside of the workforce, and therefore would like to do something meaningful for the community. With plenty of assets in retirement accounts, the client does not need to rely on distributions from IRAs to maintain lifestyle standards. This client could be a good candidate to establish a designated fund (to support a specific nonprofit organization) or a field-of-interest fund (to support an area of need such as education, health care, or the arts) at the Lenawee Community Foundation. Then, the client may direct Qualified Charitable Distributions from IRAs (up to $111,000 per taxpayer in 2026) to the fund, bypassing adjusted gross income and counting toward required minimum distributions.

The Lenawee Community Foundation is happy to help. Next time you are meeting with a client who is experiencing one of life’s inevitable rough patches, remember that charitable planning allows your client to take action that brings joy, reflects identity, aligns with purpose, and helps the client shift from a reactive mode to an intentional one.

The post Sudden life changes: Charitable giving can help clients get through it appeared first on Lenawee Community Foundation.

What’s the background with the IRS?

Under long-standing IRS guidance, a charitable contribution is generally considered “made” for tax purposes when the donor irrevocably parts with control of the gift. For contributions made by check and sent through the mail, the IRS has traditionally treated the date of the U.S. Postal Service postmark as the date of the gift, even if the charity receives the check later. This approach is reflected in IRS Publication 526 and generally parallels the broader “mailbox rule” under Internal Revenue Code Section 7502, which treats certain documents and payments as timely based on their postmark date rather than the date of receipt.

Okay, so if this is not an IRS issue, what happened?

In November 2025, the U.S. Postal Service (not the IRS) changed how postmarks are applied. Effective December 24, 2025, the official postmark date is now defined as the date of the first automated processing scan at a USPS processing facility, rather than the date a letter is dropped in a mailbox or handed to a clerk at a local post office. As a result, mail deposited on December 31, 2025 may not have actually received a postmark until several days later, especially around the holidays. This change took many people by surprise and created a lot of confusion, prompting the USPS to issue a “facts and myths” circular.

So, what’s this got to do with the IRS?

Because the IRS’s practices continue to rely on the postmark to establish the date of a mailed charitable gift, this change can cause a contribution a client intended to deduct for 2025 to be treated as a 2026 contribution if the postmark reflects a January processing date.

If my client got caught up in this change, is the client totally out of luck for a 2025 charitable deduction?

Not necessarily. Remember, the underlying IRS rules governing charitable contribution timing have not changed. Publication 526 still requires your clients to “substantiate”—meaning document—the date of their gift, and the IRS continues to look at objective evidence to substantiate and determine when the contribution was made. What has changed is the ability to rely entirely on an ordinary envelope postmark as proof of a year-end gift. (Advisors should understand that the statutory mailbox rule in Section 7502 is primarily directed at tax filings and payments to the IRS, but in practice the IRS uses similar concepts when evaluating the timing of charitable gifts, particularly where the postmark is the primary evidence of mailing.)

Okay, it sounds like all is not lost. What should I do to help my client?

If a client was caught up in this rule change at the end of 2025, the first step is to gather and preserve any alternative proof that establishes when the gift was actually mailed. Documentation such as a USPS Certificate of Mailing, a certified or registered mail receipt, or a manually applied postmark or postage validation imprint obtained at the retail counter can help demonstrate that the donor relinquished control of the gift before year-end, even if the automated processing postmark is later. Even where the client has such postal documentation, contemporaneous records such as copies of the check, the client’s notes, and any correspondence with the charity should also be retained in the event the deduction is questioned. In other words, you may be able to build a case to support a client’s deduction for 2025.

What should clients do for 2026 and beyond?

Advisors should counsel clients on how to avoid this issue going forward. Electronic giving methods such as online donations, ACH or wire transfers, and completed transfers of publicly traded securities provide clearer and more immediate timestamps for deduction purposes and do not depend on postal processing practices.

How can the Lenawee Community Foundation help?

Reach out to our team early in the year! Many clients find themselves rushing around at year-end to make charitable donations. The change in the postal rules is a terrific reason to remind a client that organizing charitable giving through a donor-advised fund at the Lenawee Community Foundation allows the client to make a donation for tax purposes to the donor-advised fund well before the end of the year, thereby securing any applicable charitable deduction, and then recommending grants from the donor-advised fund anytime to favorite charities. As always, we look forward to serving you and your clients!

The post Postmarks, rule changes, and remedies for clients’ 2025 charitable gifts appeared first on Lenawee Community Foundation.